About Jim Shultz

Jim serves as Millennial Pastor at Hope Presbyterian Church in Cordova, TN as well as Philosophy instructor for Union University’s A.Div. program. His passions are to see God’s love work through transformational friendships and to equip the Church to think deeply about their faith in order to recover the knowledge of God in culture. Jim is a pastor and teacher at heart, having trained leaders and pastors, and lectured to undergraduate and graduate students in areas such as philosophy, theology, and apologetics at colleges and universities all over the United States including University of Nebraska-Lincoln, University of Oklahoma, University of North Texas and Texas A&M University. After completing coursework at Covenant Theological Seminary, Jim received his M.Div. from Midwestern Baptist Theological Seminary in 2009. He is currently a doctoral candidate at Biola University’s Talbot School of Theology focusing on apologetics and culture studying under Drs. J.P. Moreland and Garry DeWeese.

Twitter: @jimhshultz
Blog: jimshultzblog.com

Strange Bedfellow

new-york-times-hed-2013In a recent New York Time article, Thomas Nagel offers a brief but robust explanation why a purely physical explanation of the universe will not work.  This may not seem, at first glance, to be a big issue.  However, if it is true that the universe is only physical, then there can be no human mind/soul and certainly no god.  Here is the kicker: Dr. Nagel is an atheist.  And, he is arguing for a position that is favorable to theists in general and Christians in specific.  How are we to understand this? [Read more…]

Blind Men and the Elephant

There is an old known as “the Blind Men and the Elephant.”  In this story, there are 4 blind men who are asked to determine what an elephant looks.  The first blind man feels the leg of the elephant and says, “The elephant is like a tree because it is large and round like a pillar.”  The second man feels the tail and says, “The elephant is like a rope because it is small and coarse.”  The third man feels the ear and says, “The elephant is like a fan because it is flat and thin.”  The fourth man feels the trunk and says, “The elephant is like a snake because it is long and curves.”  [Read more…]

Apologetic Character

“God is just an invention that humans created to deal with the harsh realities of the world.”  A statement like that began several weeks of my college Sociology professor giving his apologetic for atheism.

“If you believe in God, you need to leave it at the door. God is not welcomed in scientific inquiry.” As a psychology major and a Christian, it was difficult to know how to process that statement from a psychology professor.

“I know they call it the theory of evolution, but it’s pretty much a fact. Science has demonstrated that there is no God” said my Biology professor the first week of classes. [Read more…]

Frustrated Apologists

It can be frustrating talking about issues of apologetics with someone who does not believe. If not careful, the apologist can feel as if the source of his or her frustration is the person.  This can lead to guilt rooted in the sense that the apologist cares more about arguments of apologetics than loving the person.  Have you ever felt that way?  I know I have.  However, I don’t think that is often the source of our frustrations.  [Read more…]

The Pride of Claiming Christianity Is True for All People

How could I, as a white American living in 2013 be so pompous as claim to know that Christianity is true for all cultures, ethnicities, languages, places, and times?


Recently I found myself struggling with this question.  I feel guilty even thinking that I could be so prideful as to make that claim.  At first glance, it’s a valid concern.  However, inspecting the underlying assumptions to the question allow me to see where the question makes faulty assertions. [Read more…]