What’s Wrong With The Zeitgeist Movie?

The Zeitgeist movie has been circulating on the internet since 2007. In the video its director, Peter Joseph, seeks to persuade viewers that the authors of the New Testament essentially plagiarized the concept of the virgin birth, December 25 as Christ’s birth date, the twelve disciples, the miracles, the crucifixion, and the resurrection from astrological sources and pagan mythology.

The focus of this article is to address the allegation that Jesus is a mythological amalgamation of pagan deities invented by various ancient cultures. I will deal primarily with Horus, as he is the first major mythological figure presented as a forerunner of Jesus. I will subsequently deal with the other allegations in brief.

False claims about Horus
The Zeitgeist movie makes the following claims:

Claim: “This is Horus. He is the Sun God of Egypt of around 3000 BC.”

Response: Horus is not just the sun god. He was also the falcon god whose name means ‘the far-off one’. Ra was the sun god who came to be identified with the mid-day sun. In addition, Horus was also the sky god, whose good or sound eye was the sun, and injured eye the moon.

Claim: “He is the sun, anthropomorphized, and his life is a series of allegorical myths involving the sun’s movement in the sky.”

Response: This is inaccurate. Horus was not the sun, but came to be identified with the position of the rising sun. Later, he was associated with the sun-god Ra. Atum was the god of the setting sun.

Claim: “From the ancient hieroglyphics in Egypt, we know much about this solar messiah. For instance, Horus, being the sun, or the light, had an enemy known as Set and Set was the personification of the darkness or night.”

Response: Seth — Horus’ brother — was Horus’ rival (and usurper of the throne of Egypt). There is debate as to whether the struggle between Horus and Seth was primarily geo-political or symbolic in nature. When the full Osiris complex becomes visible, Seth appears as the murderer of Osiris and would-be killer of the child Horus.

Claim: “And, metaphorically speaking, every morning Horus would win the battle against Set — while in the evening, Set would conquer Horus and send him into the underworld. It is important to note that ‘dark vs. light’ or ‘good vs. evil’ is one of the most ubiquitous mythological dualities ever known and is still expressed on many levels to this day.”

Response: The movie’s claim is dead wrong. Horus was never sent to the underworld. It was Osiris who was killed and became Lord of the underworld, while Horus was king of the living.

Claim: “Broadly speaking, the story of Horus is as follows: Horus was born on December 25…”

Response: This simply isn’t the case. At any rate, neither the Bible nor Christianity claim Jesus was born on December 25, so any parallels with ancient legends are completely inconsequential. The December 25 date only came into prominence under Emperor Aurelian in the third century A.D. But when was the date of Horus? It was during the Egyptian month of Khoiak (which corresponds to November on our calendar).

Claim: “…of the virgin Isis-Meri.”

Response: Again, the claim is simply in error. Horus was born of Isis. And there is absolutely no mention in any Egyptian literature of the trailing name ‘Mary’ as the movie would have us believe. Moreover, Isis was certainly not a virgin, but the widow of Osiris, the father of Horus.

Claim: “His birth was accompanied by a star in the east.”

Response: The video continues to make stuff up as it goes along. There is simply no mention of any stars pertaining to the birth of Horus.

Claim: “…which in turn, three kings followed to locate and adorn the new-born Savior.”

Response: First up, there are no ‘three kings’ mentioned in the birth account of Horus, nor is there a mention there ‘three kings’ in the New Testament account. Rather, it is wise-men, with the number not being specified.

Claim: “At the age of 12, he was a prodigal child teacher.”

Response: Wrong again. Horus was never a child prodigal teacher. In fact, he was kept hidden away by his mother in the papyrus marshes, until he was ready to be ruler of Egypt.

Claim: “…and at the age of 30 he was baptized by a figure known as Anup and thus began his ministry.”

Response: Again, there is no evidence of any such baptism concerning Horus, nor are there any facts which suggest any form of ‘ministry’ of Horus.

Claim: “Horus had 12 disciples he travelled around with.”

Response: Horus did not have 12 disciples he travelled around with. It really is as simple as that.

Claim: “…performing miracles such as healing the sick and walking on water.”

Response: While it is true that some healing ‘miracles’ are associated with Horus, this is with Horus the Child as opposed to Horus the elder or his adult forms.

Claim: “Horus was known by many gestural names such as The Truth, The Light, God’s Anointed Son, The Good Shepherd, The Lamb of God, and many others.”

Response: Again, this is simply false. The only forms of the Horus-god are (1) Horus the Child; (2) Horus as son of Isis and Osiris (“pillar of his mother”; “savior of his father”); and (3) Horus as a sun-god (“lord of the sky; “god of the east”; “Horus of the horizon”).

Claim: “After being betrayed by Typhon, Horus was crucified, buried for 3 days, and thus, resurrected.”

Response: Wrong again. There exists no accounts of Horus being betrayed, nor a death by crucifixion. There is an incident described in one account whereby Horus is torn to pieces, with Isis requesting that the crocodile god pull him out of the water — not quite crucifixion. Moreover, seeing how the movie puts the account of Horus at around 3000 B.C., this predates the invention and practice of crucifixion by thousands of years!

Other Claims
The Zeitgeist movie continues in the same vein as above with all the other mythological pagan gods. The Zeitgeist movie makes the claim that Hindu’s Krishna was also crucified and resurrected. However, again, the Zeitgeist is in error. Hinduism very clearly teaches that Krishna was killed by a wound inflicted from an arrow shot from a hunter who mistakenly hit him in his heel. Following his death, he ascended to be with Brahman. This can hardly be compared to the Christian concept of Christ’s resurrection.

The Zeitgeist movie claims, for example, that Mithras was born of a virgin. But this is in error. Rather, he emerged from a rock. It is also claimed that Mithras rose from the dead, but there is no textual evidence of his death, so there could be no resurrection. Mithras was not a teacher, and was not followed by twelve disciples, as Zeitgeist claims.

Neither is there any evidence of a bodily resurrection of Attis, the Phrygian god of vegetation, nor the virgin birth of Dionysus or Krishna (the latter of whom was his mother’s eighth son, so a virgin birth is not likely).

Sadly, the Zeitgeist movie has become widely circulated on the Internet, deceiving many people with misinformation. As Peter writes in his first epistle, “But there were also false prophets among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you. They will secretly introduce destructive heresies, even denying the sovereign Lord who bought them — bringing swift destruction on themselves.”

According to their own testimony, the New Testament writers “did not follow cleverly invented stories when we told you about the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but we were eyewitnesses of his majesty,” (2 Peter 1:16). They were testifying not to myths, but to ‘sober truth’ about events that had ‘not been done in a corner’ (Acts 26:25-26).

This article was originally published on AllAboutTruth.org.


DISCLAIMER: Blog entries made by individual authors reflect the views of the author and not necessarily the view of other CAA authors, or the official position of the group at large.
About Jonathan McLatchie

Jonathan holds a Bachelor's degree (with Honors) in Forensic Biology, a Masters (M.Res) degree in Evolutionary Biology, and a second Master's degree in medical and molecular bioscience, and is presently a PhD student in cell biology.

Jonathan has participated in a number of internships -- those have been with the Discovery Institute in Seattle, with AllAboutGod in Colorado Springs, with Frank Turek in Charlotte, and with Josh McDowell Ministry in Dallas -- and is also a two-time graduate of the CrossExamined Instructor Academy (CIA) and the Discovery Institute's student summer seminar program.

Jonathan has also been interviewed on podcasts and radio shows including "Unbelievable?" on Premier Christian Radio, "Apologetics315", "Theology Matters with the Pellews", the "Solid Reasons Morning Show", "Dogma Debate", and Spice FM's Islamic "Eye on the East" program (airing in Tyneside, England), and has also been a featured guest on A9 TV's "Building Bridges" program, an Islamic TV show based in Istanbul Turkey.

  • http://www.facebook.com/stephenjbedard Stephen J. Bedard

    Good stuff. With regard to Isis-Meri, Isis is called Meri but not as a name. The Egyptian word means ‘beloved’ and was used for most of the gods. The Hebrew name Miriam/Mary is probably related in that the first mention is Moses’ sister who was born in Egypt. However, there is no connection between Isis and Mary (other than early Christians borrowing the statues in their early art).

  • Peter

    There’s a youtube user, Labarum312, who’s done quite a bit of sourcing on the Zeitgeist film, and the “astrotheology” that it espouses. In fact he’s self-published a book on this tracing the origins of astrotheology back to the reintroduction of many Hellenistic ideas in the renaissance with the rediscovery in Western Europe of many Greek texts. Primarily Hermeticism and Neoplatonism. Mistakenly thinking that the Hermetic Corpus was an ancient Egyptian text, Hermetic mysticism and philosophy was anachronistically projected, by , back into the distant past as lost ancient wisdom of true religion. This ancient dating led to speculation on whether Hermes Trismegistus might have tutored Moses, possibly as the origin for all the known religions.

    The Hermetic movement would collapse in the 17th century when Isaac Casaubon was able to demonstrate that the style and vocabulary of the Hermetic Corpus we’re that of Hellenistic Greek, and thus could not be an ancient Egyptian document. Although this discredited Hermeticism itself, the idea that Christianity was possibly the result of earlier mysticism and myths survived. Astrotheology as presented in Zeitgeist is the result of pieces of Hermetic mysticism, particularly it’s astrology, that were salvaged to serve as an explanation of the origin of Christianity by French savant Charles Dupuis in the late 18th Century. However, Dupuis arguments where famously debunked by Physicist Jean-Baptiste Pérès; in a pamphlet satirizing Dupuis’ work, Pérès used his arguments to argue that Napoleon Bonapart was in fact a Sun god myth based on the God Apollo and astrology.

    Although controversial originally, Astrotheology lost all notable academic support afterwards and was delegated to fringe occult and anti-religious establishment circles, being argued by individuals like Gerald Massey. However, Zeitgeist isn’t an occult film, and the source directly behind Zeitgeist isn’t any Occult movement, but rather the rise of the conspiracy theory movement in the later half of the 20th century. In particular a man by the name of Jordan Maxwell, who wove astrotheology together with a variety of seperate conspiracy theories into a larger conspiracy theory. Zeitgeist is a production inspired by Jordan Maxwell’s conspiracy theories.